Some Get What They Deserve, Others Don’t

Two totally different news stories caught my eye this week. The first illustrates the total lunacy of America’s obsession with guns. Readers will, no doubt, remember the furore created when mother-of-three, Meleanie Hain, from Pennsylvania turned up at her kids’ football game toting a 9mm Glock handgun in a holster strapped to her waist.

Hain

Quite what Mrs Hain expected to achieve by this act of egotistical mania one can only imagine, but the chickens came home to roost with a vengeance this week when husband, Scott Hain, shot his wife to death and then turned the gun on himself.[1]

The irresponsibility of both adults was compounded by the gun battle occurring while all three of the Hain’s children were in the house. Thankfully, they weren’t physically harmed. Needless to say, they are now orphans.

This incident is yet another example, if it were needed, of the crass stupidity and immaturity of America’s National Rifle Association, which has long campaigned for the carrying of firearms to be legalized, under their infamous and grossly inaccurate slogan: ‘Guns Save Lives’.

Perhaps a more appropriate aphorism might be: ‘He Who Lives By The Gun Shall Perish By The Gun’.

The announcement from Norway this week that US President Barack Obama was to receive the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize came as something of a surprise to many people.

The bewilderment is obvious. This prestigious award is invariably given for achievement, and while many would not question his good intentions, Obama’s efforts towards peace in the world have, as yet, borne little or no fruit. Indeed, if good intention is sufficient to satisfy the wise men of Norway, there are many of us on this planet qualified to wear Alfred Nobel’s gold medal around our necks.

We must, however, have some sympathy for those who have to make these decisions. In today’s violent world it cannot always be easy to find a suitable recipient. If, however, Obama succumbs to the demands of his top Afghanistan adviser, General Stanley McChrystal, and deploys a further 40,000 US troops to that country, then the argument that he is unworthy of the peace prize becomes more tenable.[2]

To be worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize one must be aware that winning wars is not about peace. Peace is only achieved by avoiding them.

Perhaps, after all, it’s time to consign all prestigious awards to the garbage cans of history. Once, they held a certain aura of dignity, but today’s awards are often based more on ‘prizes for the boys’ rather than genuine achievement.

Nowhere was this more obvious than in New York recently when British Prime Minister, and inept politician, Gordon Brown, was awarded the title, ‘Statesman of the Year’, by a little known Jewish organization calling itself the ‘Appeal of Conscience Foundation’.[3]

The Foundation hails as one its star members, perhaps the greatest US war criminal ever, Henry Alfred Kissinger.

Kissinger was also a recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, in 1973. An award that caused the well-known musical satirist, Tom Lehrer, to remark:

“Political satire became obsolete when Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Prize.”

[1] “Gun-Toting Pa. Soccer Mom, Husband Found Dead” KIROTV.Com, October 7/8th 2009

[2] “Why does McChrystal need more troops for Afghanistan?” CSM, September 21st 2009

[3] “Brown World Statesman of the Year” Channel 4 News, September 23rd 2009

Filed under:

6 Replies to “Some Get What They Deserve, Others Don’t”

  1. R. J. Adams, I am going to add an important tidbit to the first story which cooperate media forgot to include conveniently.

    The mother who was shot dead by her husband was being abused by her husband for many years. Also, he is a police officer…. She had court order against him and was carrying a gun at all times in order to protect herself from him.

    Now I am not in anyway excusing her behavior around children. I am against guns like I am against war, hunger, organized religion and god-damn globalization. However, I also feel she was attacked by the media for a reason. The fact that she was beaten regularly at home by her police officer husband was left out of the story…. interesting don’t you think?

  2. WWW – ….or something!

    Nevin – despite scouring the local and national accounts of this story, I can find nothing to support your statement. Certainly, Scott Hain had worked as a prison officer, and at the time was a county parole officer, but I can find no evidence of any court order against him by his wife. Most reports state the marriage was “up and down”, though it seems likely the wife was planning to leave him, which may have instigated the tragedy. Neither can I locate evidence of physical abuse, beatings, etc.. Any references (links) you have to a court order would be much appreciated.
    More about this case may come to light following the post mortems.

  3. Yesterday morning on WBAI (NYC based radio station), there was a discussion about domestic violence and her name was brought up with the story I told you. I did not read it on the net. But let me do some research and see what I can come up with….

  4. Nevin – thanks for that. This report is somewhat sketchy. While it definitely links Hain’s name with domestic violence, it fails to be specific.
    I think the lesson is that guns in the home (or strapped to a hip outside) aggravate any situation. To handle a weapon properly requires coolness of purpose. The emotional trauma of relationship break-up is the very last situation where a gun could be considered desirable.
    No doubt more of this unfortunate story will emerge in due course.

Comments are closed.