
The headline in today’s Guardian doesn’t quite say it all.
For, “Marco Rubio launches campaign to dismantle international criminal court,” read:
“Marco Rubio launches campaign to dismantle International Law.”
It’s another of those moments, (of which there’s been many since the present administration gained power in the United States) when the long-term aim of its authoritarian government makes itself blazingly obvious.
The international criminal court was set up in July 2002 following ratification of the Rome Statute in 1998. It had been under discussion for nearly half a century before finally coming to fruition.
“In the prospect of an international criminal court lies the promise of universal justice. That is the simple and soaring hope of this vision. We are close to its realization. We will do our part to see it through till the end. We ask you . . . to do yours in our struggle to ensure that no ruler, no State, no junta and no army anywhere can abuse human rights with impunity. Only then will the innocents of distant wars and conflicts know that they, too, may sleep under the cover of justice; that they, too, have rights, and that those who violate those rights will be punished.
“For nearly half a century — almost as long as the United Nations has been in existence — the General Assembly has recognized the need to establish such a court to prosecute and punish persons responsible for crimes such as genocide. Many thought . . . that the horrors of the Second World War — the camps, the cruelty, the exterminations, the Holocaust — could never happen again. And yet they have. In Cambodia, in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in Rwanda. Our time — this decade even — has shown us that man’s capacity for evil knows no limits. Genocide . . . is now a word of our time, too, a heinous reality that calls for a historic response.” — Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary-General .
Out of 195 nation states in the world, 125 are members of the ICC. Of those that are not, the most obvious are China, India, Israel, Russia, and the United States. China, India and Russia are controlled by authoritarian dictators. Israel has put itself outside of International Law by it’s continuing genocide in Gaza and the West Bank,
The United States, by calling for the disbandment of the ICC, which it has never recognised for obvious reasons, if successful would result in International Law becoming meaningless. It would allow for rogue nations to run riot against their own people and those of other countries with impunity.
The idea for an international court arose from the success of the Nuremburg trials of war criminals following World War Two. It was an attempt to prevent the horrors of that conflict ever happening again.

There are those that say the ICC has failed to achieve its raison d’être. Look, they say, at Myanmar, Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, ongoing genocidal conflicts. There are other conflicts around the world afflicted by acts construed as international war crimes.
But this is not the fault of the ICC. The fault is often with lily-livered politicians who allow wanted war criminals into their nations and abscond from their duty to have them arrested and transferred to the ICC at the Hague. One of the most publicized of these occurred when Omar al-Bashir, the ex-president of Sudan, visited South Africa (a member state of the ICC) in 2015 and was never arrested. Jacob Zuma was the president of South Africa at that time until deposed in 2018. He treated al-Bashir as his personal guest.
Marco Rubio’s campaign to disband the ICC can only have one purpose. It is even more evidence that the United States is set to become yet another rogue state at odds with the rest of the civilized world.



