Author: R J Adams

Occasionally, society is faced with a disease that threatens humanity. Usually vaccinations are manufactured that control the organism and all is well. Then, surreptitiously, the disease reappears under a different guise and new vaccinations need to be discovered to deal with it.

Unfortunately, society appears to have no effective vaccine to permanently overcome the virulent organism that is the ex-British Prime Minister, Tony Blair.

After some years on the outskirts of society, shunned by the media, the Blair organism has gradually been reintroducing itself. More and more frequent cases have been appearing on the back pages of media sites and popular news tomes, until now the beginnings of an epidemic are apparent on the front pages of the BBC, Guardian, and other U.K. news outlets.

This latest outbreak is cleverly disguised as a benevolent bacteria. It fronts the latest Blair attempt to ingratiate itself back into society as one of those ‘benevolent bacteria’. The “Blair Foundation” is ostensibly portrayed as a means to :

…promote greater understanding between the world’s religions and to challenge extremism and prejudice…^[1]

It’s a clever device to hide a malignancy once more spreading across the U.K., and if not stopped, eventually the whole of the Western world.

Don’t be fooled. Since time immemorial there have been many organisations specifically designed to “promote greater understanding between the world’s religions,” – they’re called “churches”.

The “Blair Foundation” is a clever mutation to once again spread Blair throughout humanity, and it’s using the mainstream media to infect us all with its malignancy.

Blair’s latest quote: “The West is not to blame for the situation in the Middle East,” is paramount in recognizing the true malignancy of this latest mutation of the organism. There can be no element of doubt, when facts are truly known and the West’s interventions in the Middle East over the last century properly analysed, that Western nations – mainly Britain, France, and more latterly, the United States – are the sole reason for today’s “situation in the Middle East.”

The Blair is on the move. It can be stopped. The Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq War is finally to be published on July 6th, and this latest outbreak of the disease is surely in readiness for that. The report will unlikely be sufficient on its own to prevent further spread of the infection. Only a public uprising, condemning once and for all the malignancy of Blair, in all its mutations, and ensuring it’s locked away for good where it can do no further harm to humanity, will suffice to prevent further contamination.

Be warned. Be prepared. Blair is once again out to get – YOU!

^{[1] “Blair: Corbyn in power would be a ‘dangerous experiment'” BBC, May 28th 2016}

There are times I wish the British would just shut up and give others a chance. One can’t watch the BBC news, or peruse its website (or that of any other U.K. media outlet) without being forced to listen to opinions on the European Union spouted by folk who really don’t know what they’re talking about. Their views reflect whichever celebrity politician turns them on the most, and whether he/she is a “Stayer”, or a “Leaver”.

Those most needing to refrain from opinion are the old fogeys (like me!). It won’t matter one iota to those over sixty whether Britain stays in Europe, or leaves. By the time any advantage, or disadvantage, results from the referendum on June 23rd, they’ll all be dead anyway. This is all about the future of Britain for the young. Anyone over fifty shouldn’t even be allowed to vote.

One hears constant, arrogantly expressed remarks like, “I’m British. I don’t want to be European,” or, “I want to stay in Europe. When I’m in France or Germany I love to flaunt my Britishness. I love being British.”

Such rampant nationalism was just what the Brits complained about in 1930’s Germany.

Perhaps, after all, Britain should leave Europe and become the 51st state of the U.S.A.. Brits have moaned on for years about “arrogant Americans” coming to London and complaining. Now, it seems they have much in common with their transatlantic neighbours.

We all know that Britain and the U.S. share a “special relationship” (ha!) but it’s not just Britain that relies on America for its security. NATO covers all of Europe and is spearheaded these days by the U.S. military establishment. It comes as something of a shock, therefore, to learn that the Pentagon is still controlling its nuclear arsenal using 1970’s era computers with floppy disks:

The US nuclear weapons force still uses a 1970s-era computer system and floppy disks, a government report has revealed.
The Government Accountability Office said the Pentagon was one of several departments where “legacy systems” urgently needed to be replaced.
The report said taxpayers spent $61bn (£41bn) a year on maintaining ageing technologies.
It said that was three times more than the investment on modern IT systems.
The report said that the Department of Defence systems that co-ordinated intercontinental ballistic missiles, nuclear bombers and tanker support aircraft “runs on an IBM Series-1 Computer – a 1970s computing system – and uses eight-inch floppy disks”.^[1]

According to Pentagon spokeswoman, Lt Col Valerie Henderson, this is not a reason to feel insecure:

…the floppy drives are scheduled to be replaced with secure digital devices by the end of 2017.”

An investment in DVD drives, perhaps?

I have an aging HP XW4600 Workstation I would gladly donate if it would help improve nuclear security?

Maybe, after all, Britain would be better sticking with Europe.

^{“US nuclear force ‘still uses floppy disks'” BBC, May 26th 2016}

With the EU referendum in Britain now less than a month away, one of the strongest arguments of the “Out” campaign is the ‘loss of sovereignty’ resulting from the U.K. being a part of Europe. Given the decision taken by the North Yorkshire County Council yesterday, this argument is laughable.

Sparrow Chat has long espoused the view that the U.K. is now little more than a satellite of the United States (Obama’s exertions to keep the U.K. in the E.U. served no other purpose than to provide the U.S. with a leverage in Europe, via Britain) and the democratic process is being similarly, systematically, eroded in the United Kingdom as in the nation with which it claims its “special relationship”.

Fracking was suspended in the U.K. in 2011 following minor earthquakes, but in April 2012 the U.K. government gave local authorities the option to allow drilling in their area. Until this week, none has given permission, due to huge public reaction against the process.

Yesterday, North Yorkshire County Council decided to ignore the demands of its voters, and agreed, by a 7-4 majority, to allow fracking to commence in the area.

Planners had recommended the Kirby Misperton plan was approved, but acknowledged the majority of representations received in consultation were objections.
Vicky Perkin, a council planning officer, told the committee that of 4,420 individual representations, just 36 were in support of the application.
But her report also said it should be noted there was a “national policy support for the development of a shale gas industry in this country and this is an important material consideration”.^[1]

Despite objections to the fracking running at 122-1, North Yorkshire County Council still decided to override the democratic process and grant permission for the company, Third Energy, to proceed with fracking in the area.

What is ‘Third Energy’?

Tracing the money back isn’t difficult. Third Energy (originally Viking Oil) was bought out by Barclays Natural Resources Investments in 2010. BNRI is a private equity arm (read ‘hedge fund’) of Barclays Bank, which in turn is the operating arm of Barclays plc, the 25th largest company in the world.

In 2015, Barclays, along with Citigroup, JPMorgan and RBS, were between them fined $6 billion for manipulating the price of US dollars and euros. The company is hand-in-glove with the U.K. and U.S. governments and operates a ‘revolving door’ principle by which lucrative employment is offered government ministers and high officials from both nations while temporarily ‘out of office’.

Quote:

Thomas David Guy Arculus, an independent non-executive Director from 1997 to 2006, was a member of the UK Government’s Better Regulation Task Force within the Cabinet Office from 2002 to 2005.

Sir Richard Broadbent, the former Chairman of HM Customs & Excise, has been a Senior Independent Director at Barclays plc since 2003. He is Chairman of transport services company Arriva PLC.

Mark Clarke, currently Director-General of Finance at the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, worked at Barclays from 2000 to 2003.

Sarah Cox of the Cabinet Office’s Business Support Group worked at Barclays plc from 2001 to 2004.

James Duddridge, Conservative MP for Rochford and Southend East since 2005 worked at Barclays Bank 1993–2002.

U.K. Life Peer Robert Fellowes, Lord Fellowes of Shotesham, was Chairman of Barclays Private Bank from 2000 until December 2009.

U.K. Life Peer Digby Jones, Lord Jones of Birmingham, who was Minister of State for UK Trade and Investment from 2007 to 2008, was a Senior Advisor to Barclays Capital from 2006 to 2007.

Sir Andrew Likierman, an independent non-executive Director since September 2004, was a Non-executive Director of the Bank of England and was Chief Accountancy Advisor at HM Treasury from 1993 to 2003.

Francis Maude, Conservative MP for Horsham, is a member of Barclays Asia-Pacific Advisory Committee.

Jami Miscik, who became Global Head of Sovereign Risk at Barclays Capital after it bought Lehman Brothers, was Deputy Director of Intelligence at the CIA from 2002 to 2005.

Sir Anthony Reeve, Ambassador to South Africa 1991-96, was Director Barclays Private Bank Ltd, 1997–2001.

Barclays Bank plc employee Howard Spiers was seconded to the Department for Trade and Industry from 1998 to 2001 as an export promoter.

Robert K. Steel, a Non Executive Director of Barclays Bank plc from 2005 to 2006, was Under Secretary, Domestic Finance, U.S. Department of the Treasury from 2006 to 2008.

Sir David Wright, a former British diplomat and Group Chief Executive at British Trade International, became Vice-Chairman of Barclays Capital in 2003. (For references see Wikipedia – ‘Barclays’)

It’s easy to construe from this that North Yorkshire County Council were merely spearheading a much larger and more powerful group composed of a huge, multi-national, private company in league with the British and United States governments. One can only theorize just exactly what the elected members of the North Yorkshire County Council received in return for playing Judas to the constituents they’re supposed to represent in North Yorkshire, but it surely has to be substantial.

Democracy and sovereignty are long dead. What we are living with today are merely the ghosts of both.

^{[1] “Landmark North Yorkshire fracking operation approved” BBC, May 24th 2016}