web analytics

World Superpower – Or Just A One Hoss Town?

I finally found time tonight to watch Bill Moyer’s presentation on PBS, “Buying the War”. It’s hard these days to find a spare ninety minutes for the TV, but I knew this one would be worth it, and I wasn’t disappointed. While there was little new, or earth-shattering, to anyone who took an interest in determining facts over spin, the program pulled no punches when criticizing the mainstream media for its inability, or unwillingness, to separate factual evidence from government fiction in the months leading up to the Iraq War.

Indeed, not a lot has changed since then. The situation still continues to this day. However, while the media must shoulder much of the blame for failing to present its readers with the truth about Saddam Hussein’s Iraq – and the administration’s deliberate and often clumsy attempts to distort those truths – in the main it was pandering to what most Americans wanted to hear.

One aspect Moyer’s documentary failed to confront, vital to the administration’s ability to wage its war in Iraq, was the attitude of a majority of ordinary Americans in the twelve months following 9/11.

Those of us old enough, will remember the vintage, black and white, Hollywood westerns depicting a one-hoss town, a local celeb shot down in cold blood, and the poor unfortunate, innocent stranger hounded by the townsfolk until eventually lynched from the tallest suitable tree. Of course, in those films a fair-minded US Marshall unearths the real culprit, the townsfolk are filled with remorse, blame each other for the consequences, and to appease their own guilt erect a monument to the slaughtered stranger before going about their business.

After 9/11, America became that one-hoss town. The twin towers played the local celeb gunned down; Iraq, the innocent stranger lynched by a rabid mob determined to secure vengeance.

Yes, America – you were that mob. The media just fed your blood-lust.

When I arrived on American soil in September 2002, exactly one year and one week after 9/11, what I saw all around me was disturbing. It was more than disturbing, it was frightening. I beheld a nation in emotional turmoil. Patriotic bunting adorned every building; flags fluttered atop most cars. TV programs cited patriotism and American pride as the ultimate goals of every citizen. It was almost physically possible to smell the blood lust on the air. America was screaming for vengeance. The USA was being rent apart at the seams.

It was that national shriek for retribution – for blood – that allowed this administration and those who controlled it, to implement their long held ideals and invade Iraq as part of a much greater scheme for Middle East domination.

Recent polls show Americans still supporting the war number around 35%. In 2003, when it all started, 83% expressed confidence in the war, and 65% (almost two-thirds of the population!) were PROUD of the war.

Today, America has carried out its lynching, satiated its blood-lust. Now, however, it is becoming apparent the innocent have been slaughtered. It’s the wrong blood. Like the townsfolk of the old, black and white westerns, Americans are turning on each other, pointing fingers in a desperate attempt to divert the blame – and the shame.

Most of the bunting has now gone from the buildings; the US flag is rarely seen flying from motor vehicles. Even the bumper stickers have dwindled. But this nation is still in turmoil. America remains a disturbed country, just as frightening as when I first arrived in September 2002.

The raw power that is America runs amok, unrestrained by good and competent leadership. The battle for the Middle East has declined into a bloody, unremitting slog, likely to continue indefinitely; at least, until someone with vision and true authority ascends to the President’s Office and, like the US Marshall of old, brings order out of chaos, and harmony to a one-hoss town where the population has trouble coming to terms with its guilt and remorse.

Filed under:

Time To Change Their Diapers?

Do we ever mature beyond the nursery years? Is there really a period of “adulthood” or is it simply a continuation of adolescence? Media portrayal of the news leaves one thinking, if we are not all immature, then certainly our leaders lack the strength of character necessary for those supposedly in such exalted positions.

Are world governments nothing more than play-centers for the mentally retarded?

Take the news today as an example:

The BBC leads with a story about Estonia and Russia – coming to blows over a statue. Russia has recalled its ambassador; Estonia says the statue is a symbol of Russian occupation, and must go.

At the end of it all – one person is already dead – it’s just a lump of stone.

Meanwhile, in India Richard Gere is facing arrest for daring to kiss an Indian film star in public. Never mind the huge amount of work Gere has undertaken in India on behalf of AIDS victims, an infantile judiciary has issued a warrant for his arrest.

Yesterday, Britain’s baby-boy prime minister lied through his milk teeth by suggesting he would “be delighted” if his son wanted to fight in Iraq. Having spent much time and effort ensuring son Euan was out the country for the duration of the Iraq war, first as an intern working for Washington politicians, and later tucked away at Yale University where he’d just happened to win a $100,000 scholarship (nothing to do with Daddy, of course) Tony Blair could happily wish his son in the midst of Iraqi insurgent bombing, knowing full well it was never going to happen.

In America, the toddlers charged with running things at the White House decided today would be a good time to announce the capture of Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi.

Who?

Dare you ask? This guy is, according to the kiddies in the State department, “……one of Osama Bin Laden’s “top global deputies”, personally chosen by the al-Qaeda leader to monitor operations in Iraq.”

Perhaps that’s why his name is Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi?

As an aside, it was also mentioned – in passing – that Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi was actually captured late last year. How late? November? December? At best, five months ago! No mention at the time, of course, that such an extremely high-ranking al-Qaeda operative had been caught. He’s been held until now in one of those secret CIA prison places that don’t exist, and only yesterday was suddenly moved, with much associated publicity, to the “George W Bush Guest House for Middle Eastern Gentlemen”, known colloquially as Guantanamo Bay Detention Center.

Of course, its not the least bit childish that our Middle Eastern friend was suddenly hauled into the limelight just a day after the much publicized furore between the American president and Congress over troop funding and their envisaged withdrawal from Iraq.

To even suggest a connection would surely be childish and immature –

– wouldn’t it?

Filed under:

Should He, Or Shouldn’t He?

Controversy is presently raging over Prince Harry, third in line to the British throne, and whether he should risk his royal neck fighting in Iraq. Harry recently completed his military training, and as a Troop Commander in the Household Cavalry’s Blues and Royals regiment, is preparing to take charge of a squad consisting of eleven men and four light tanks.

While official concerns for Harry’s safety in Iraq stem from a resurgence in violence around Basra, certain anonymous whispers late one evening from the Palace of Westminster Club, suggested overly-zealous, trigger-happy Yanks might prove just as fatal to the English royal prince as they were to one of their own football stars.

“And that,” one elderly Earl was heard to mutter behind his whisky glass, “could prove bloody embarrassing, eh, what?”

Filed under:

Hosted By A2 Hosting

Website Developed By R J Adams