web analytics

Nothing Better To Do?

Browsing the BBC website this morning, I was struck by two items of widely differing subject, but with one obvious factor in common. They were both, it appeared, a complete waste of time and money.

I have the greatest respect for science; without it we’d still be living in mud huts and foraging berries, but when a group of Danish and Czech scientists turn their attention to digging up a 16th century astronomer, merely in the hope of discovering what he died of, then frankly they’re obviously short of something more productive to do.

Poor old Tycho Brahe, regarded by some as the father of modern astronomy, died in 1601. Three hundred years later he was exhumed for the first time, by a load of early 20th century alchemists curious to know if he’d been poisoned by his assistant, Johannes Kepler.

On that occasion, high levels of mercury were found in Brahe’s mustache hairs, but as he’d delved into chemistry and alchemy during his lifetime, it really failed to prove anything.

Now, one hundred and nine years later, Brahe is to be temporarily hauled back into societal circulation for the exact same purpose.

In these days of economic instability, global warming, and terrorists behind every lamp post, it’s good to know that science is focused on worthwhile issues. While he’s ‘out’, it’s also hoped to discover the metallic properties of Brahe’s nasal prosthesis.

That’ll be a bonus.

Professor Jens Vellev, from Aarhus University in Denmark, who’s leading the exhumation, says he expects modern technology will allow for a better guess at what killed the famous star gazer:

“Perhaps, we will be able to come close to an answer,” he told the BBC, “but I don’t think we will get a final answer to that question.”[1]

Never mind, they can always dig him up again in another hundred years.

There may seem little similarity between Tycho Brahe and a Renault ‘Zoe’, but on the BBC website this morning they’re only a click apart.

The ‘Zoe’ is a small, smart-looking, prototype electric car from the French motor manufacturer (eat your heart out General Motors) and it’s hard to imagine why it should become the subject of a private court case. But it has.

Apparently, girls called ‘Zoe’ throughout France are dismayed at having a car named after them. A French lawyer by the name of David Koubbi is making lots of money representing these ladies in court, demanding Renault drop the name in favor of something less, well – feminine?

From the BBC website:

“There’s a line between living things and inanimate objects, and that line is defined by the first name,” …..lawyer David Koubbi told Associated Press.

“We’re telling Renault one very simple thing: first names are for humans.”

Following Wednesday’s hearing, Mr Koubbi told reporters that the judge had accepted Renault’s argument that Zoe “was not a first name, but just a common noun”. He said that logic was perverse.

He also argued that all of France’s thousands of Zoes could be affected, with playground teasing and, as they grow older, comments in bars such as “Can I see your airbags?” or “Can I shine your bumper?””[2]

David Koubbi had previously written to Renault’s chief executive arguing that the plans were an attack on the rights of his clients. If he’s correct, they’re also an attack on the rights of: an indigenous tribe of the Brazilian Amazon, a town in Lee County, Kentucky, United States, an alternative/psychedelic band from Mexico, an American independent record label, an American rapper, and a British singer best known for her hit “Sunshine on a Rainy Day” (all courtesy of ‘Wikipedia’).

And let’s not forget the American motor manufacturer, Zoe Motors, who built and marketed the……ah……oooops…’Zoe Zipper’……[3]

……sorry Mister Koubbi, it’s already been done. Back in 1983. And no-one objected. So, there’s a precedent.

Which may, or may not, be why the judge threw out the case.

Making the whole affair another huge waste of time and money.

Of course, there’ll be an appeal, so it’ll all be exhumed again – just like Tycho Brahe.

[1] “Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe exhumed to solve mystery” BBC, November 15th 2010

[2] “Renault can name new car Zoe as girls’ case rejected” BBC, November 11th 2010

[3] “Zoe Motors” 3-Wheelers.com

Filed under:

Confessions Of A War Criminal – On Bookshelves Now!

George W Bush has the gall to write publish a book about his presidency that he, no doubt, expects the American people to buy and read. Does he believe that two years of obscurity is sufficient to dull the memory of Abu Ghraib, Fallujah, and the torture of US prisoners at his (admitted) command?

Not to mention Kyoto; The ICC; destroying any chance of diplomacy with Iran; 100,000 dead Iraqis; 4,000 dead Americans; supporting the mass slaughter of Lebanese civilians by Israel in the 2006 Lebanon war; trampling all over the Geneva Conventions.

And then, of course, there was Hurricane Katrina.

Is two years long enough for the American people to forget?

Yes, for many it probably is.

Will it be long before a similar literary offering emerges from Bush’s puppetmeister, Cheney?

He could call it: “Topiary – or, How To Shape A Bush My Way.”

For a more detailed analysis of George W Bush’s presidency, see this week’s “Latest Hot Link” in the sidebar.

Filed under:

Texas Governor Rick Perry ‘Doesn’t Corner Good’

Darling of the Tea Party, Texas governor Rick Perry, says the states should decide whether to opt out of Social Security.

From the CNN ParkerSpitzer Show:

Texas Governor Rick Perry says the idea of letting states opt out of Social Security is worthy of discussion.

Here’s a transcript of the exchange:

Rick Perry: Let’s talk about it, but let’s not put it over there and say, “we can’t talk about that—that’s the third rail of politics”. I don’t believe that that’s wise and thoughtful.
Eliot Spitzer: You’ll forgive me if I’m going to push you a little on this. You’ve been the governor of the great state of Texas for a decade now

RP: Ten years

ES: A decade now, you’ve run social welfare programs, saying, “let’s make it part of the discussion” is fine, but begs for the follow up: are you for it. You’ve studied this question. You have a book here complaining about government obligations.

RP: I’m for having, I’m for pushing…

ES: Yes or no, do you want to raise the retirement age?

RP: I’m on with two very bright, capable commentators having this discussion with the American people. I don’t put in that book “Fed Up” that I have all the answers, but I think we ought to have this conversation…

ES: But you’ve got to have an answer. I don’t expect anybody to have all the answers, but you’ve got to have an answer. So, having a conversation isn’t an answer. Having a conversation is a political punt. What is the answer? What is the answer? Will you raise the retirement age or not?

Kathleen Parker: I have no control over him.

RP: Well, I’m not going to be the President of the United States, but I’m going to be engaged in…

ES: No, but you’ve been the governor for ten years and you’ve written a book harshly criticizing…

RP: Well, last time I checked…

ES: Harshly critical of federal policies…

RP: Here’s what I think would be a very wise thing. In 1981, Matagorda, Brazoria, and Galveston Counties all opted out of the Social Security program for their employees. Today, their program is very, very well-funded and there is no question about whether it’s going to be funded in the out years. It’s there. That’s an option out there.

ES: So, you want to let people opt out?
RP: I think, let the states decide if that’s what’s best for their cities.

ES: So the states will let people opt out of Social Security.

RP: They should, I think it’s a discussion…

ES: I haven’t seen anybody propose that before because that’s going to be…

RP: Well, we just laid that on the table so let’s talk about it.

ES: OK, so that’s your plan?

RP: That’s not my plan, Eliot.

ES: But, governor, I’m trying to get you, look, you’ve written a book…

RP: I know, you’re trying to get me in a corner and I don’t corner very good. What I’m trying to do is have a discussion with the people of this country on an issue…

KP: I think that’s a brand-new idea. Nobody has said that before.

ES: That’s because it doesn’t work.

RP: That nobody, nobody is willing to talk about.

ES: No, no, here is the problem I have, the Tea Party, and we’ve had everybody from Dick Armey to Richard Viguerie, folks who have been leading this movement, dodging and dancing, unable to give a single answer about what they actually support. Having a conversation is to push it someplace else.

RP: Right.

ES: I want to know if there’s an answer. Will you: raise the retirement age? Are you saying you want private accounts? You can say it, we’ll disagree, but at least it’s an answer.

RP: Sure.

ES: OK. So.

RP: I think all of those are legitimate options out there, but let the states decide. Don’t force us from Washington, DC to say, “here is the size of tube socks that you’re gonna wear down in Texas. Put ‘em on.”[1]

Tea party politicians are all the same; they want to rip government apart, but haven’t the faintest idea what to put in its place. These people are solely career politicians with no compassion for, or understanding of, ordinary people. Many of them are politically illiterate.

I particularly liked the quote of Perry’s: “you’re trying to get me in a corner and I don’t corner very good.”

Is he, perhaps, comparing himself to a clapped-out ’57 Edsel?

[1] “Perry: Let states decide Social Security” CNN, November 4th 2010

Filed under:

Hosted By A2 Hosting

Website Developed By R J Adams