web analytics

Dis-Service With A Smile.

It looks like the terrorists have been at Blogger again. All their servers are down. Has anyone informed Homeland Security?

Frankly, I daily bless my decision to move from Blogger. It’s grown so big that I believe it’s stopped caring for its customers. This is a noticeable problem as companies become more “corporate”. Perhaps a better word would be “corpulent”. Once they grow so fat they no longer need to worry about survival, that’s when the customer loses importance.

If you don’t believe me, just compare the service that used to be available from the little shop down the road, to the likes of….say, Wal-Mart. And don’t be fooled by all this “Thank you for shopping at Wal-Mart. Have a nice day!” nonsense from the old biddy sat by the front doors. She’s paid to do that all day long. She couldn’t care less if you have a nice day or get run over by a number thirty-seven bus on your way home, just so long as she gets her paycheck every week.

It’s a carefully crafted veneer to fool you into thinking you’re important to them. Believe me, you’re not. Wal-Mart is so huge it no longer needs you – the customer. In truth, you need it.

Why?

Because there’s nowhere else for most of America to shop. Being huge means Wal-Mart can undercut any other retailer still scratching a living from the stale grain that fatchick Wal-Mart has discarded on the barnyard floor. Giving up Wal-Mart means spending more money; cash the average American doesn’t have spare these days.

And it’s not just Wal-Mart. Try obtaining any sort of reasonable service from AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, or any other of the giant telecommunication companies. Oh, sure, after hanging on the phone for three days you’ll get a friendly Asian from Bangladesh, or a Somaliland native who hasn’t a clue what you’re talking about – nor you, him – but get your problem fixed? No way!

Americans now serve the corporates. You are there for their convenience. Once upon a time it was the other way around, but not anymore.

Now let me just see if Blogger is allowing its customers access yet.

No. Still the “Error 500” message.

Perhaps they’ve just closed down for their coffee break.

Filed under:

Victory – The Heavy Price Of Iraqi Oil.

So, its unofficially official. Numerous administration moles have leaked to the media that George W Bush will go on television Wednesday night to announce another 20,000 troops are to be sent to Iraq.

Surprise, surprise!

Against the wishes of many top military personnel, most of Congress, and the vast majority of the American people (not to mention the rest of the world, who matter even less to George W Bush) this president will have his way.

It seems that once again he has only listened to advisors who dance to his tune, ignoring the far greater number urging he do exactly the opposite and begin bringing troops home. Such single-minded tunnel vision is a true mark of the alcoholic personality.

His ears were open to advisors like retired General Jack Keane, and Frederick W. Kagan who, along with his brother Robert and their father Donald, are signatories to the neoconservative Project for the New American Century manifesto of 2000 entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”.

Keane and Kagan recently set out their strategy for Iraq in this Washington Post article before attending a meeting on January 6th of what has become known as the “real Iraq Study Group”, a conglomeration of neoconservative hawks with their own agenda for Iraq, that have found more favor with the presidential ears than any members of the official ISG.

Notable by their presence at this American Enterprise Institute meeting were Independent Senator Joe Lieberman, and presidential hopeful – the master of two-facedness – Republican Senator John McCain.

One example of the bombastic arrogance of which these peope are capable came today from retired General Jack Keane in an interview on the BBC World News. Introduced as a “Bush policy advisor” Keane said:

“We have the military capability and the prowess to secure Baghdad. Look, you telling me that there’s a capital city in the world that the foremost military in the world when it applies itself cannot secure the population in a given city? That’s just rubbish. Of course we can do this.”

Retired General Jack Keene is right militarily, if not grammatically. The American military can secure Baghdad. Germany had the “foremost military in the world” when it secured Paris in 1940. But it failed to win over the hearts and minds of the French people who fought a continuous and deadly resistance against Nazi occupation until the Allies eventually liberated Paris four years later.

This is the fate awaiting American soldiers if Keane and his colleagues get their way. No occupying force in history has ever won the hearts and minds of the nation it conquered. Do Kagan and Keane and George W Bush really think they’ll have a first?

Or……maybe they don’t really care.

Not noticeable in the American media as yet, but in yesterday’s Independent Newspaper was a report that stated:

“Iraq’s massive oil reserves, the third-largest in the world, are about to be thrown open for large-scale exploitation by Western oil companies under a controversial law which is expected to come before the Iraqi parliament within days.”

This law, which the US government has been involved in drafting, will according to the Independent:

“…..give big oil companies such as BP, Shell and Exxon 30-year contracts to extract Iraqi crude and allow the first large-scale operation of foreign oil interests in the country since the industry was nationalised in 1972.”

It would seem this law is selling ordinary Iraqis down the river. The contracts allow the oil companies to keep 75% of the revenue until they have recouped initial drilling costs, and after that they would retain 20% of all profits. That’s twice the industry standard for such deals. A colossal amount of money that will not be going where it rightly belongs – into the Iraqi treasury.

It’s what this war was all about from the start.

As the Independent notes:

“Several major oil companies are said to have sent teams into the country in recent months to lobby for deals ahead of the law, though the big names are considered unlikely to invest until the violence in Iraq abates.”

If George W Bush and his cronies are going to win the battle for oil in Iraq, Baghdad has to be tamed sufficiently for “the big names to invest”.

As Jack Keane says, the American military can secure Baghdad, but when news of this underhand deal between Maliki, Bush, and the western oil magnates reaches that city’s streets it will pour oil on the furnace of discontent already raging. Little wonder Nouri al-Maliki has no backbone for American withdrawal. He will need protection from the wrath of Iraqis when his involvement is known, or he will likely follow Saddam Hussein to the gallows, or perhaps just a knife in his back.

Arizona Senator John McCain, an ardent supporter of the neocon plan, has prophesied that things will get a lot worse in Iraq before they get better. He doesn’t often speak wisely, not even for the wrong reasons, but on this occasion he is right.

The heavy price of George W Bush’s oil will be paid in American lives.

Filed under:

Would You Like One Of These?

Its manufacturers hope this neat, compact, little machine will become the hottest fashion accessory of 2007.

_42424849_taser203.gif

Every cool dude needs one, and they come in a range of stylish colors – pink, blue, silver and black – to compliment one’s cellphone, Ipod, or Blackberry.

In case you’re in any doubt as to its identity, this is a Taser. Point it, squeeze the trigger, and ZAP! Yes, a quick injection of 50,000 volts into the poor unfortunate who dared to upset you.

Of course, if your victim has a weak heart, or uses a pacemaker, you may kill them – but what the hell! – it’s only another of those fun toys…….and in the majority of states you don’t even need a permit!

Can’t resist? This little baby will set you back well under $1,000. At that price, why not have a matching pair?

Taser’s chairman, Tom Smith, would have you believe everything written above is true. However, before rushing off to Wal-Mart you may like to take an hour or so to go HERE and read not only what these things do to people, but what effect they have on those who use them.

According to Tom Smith: (via the BBC)

“The new device brings our life-saving technology into a new, consumer friendly form factor designed to provide a safer, effective means of personal protection.”

Strange, considering Amnesty International argues they’ve been linked to 150 deaths since 2001.

The weapons are designed to administer 50,000 volts for five seconds. No scientific research has been carried out into the effects of such a powerful burst of electricity – police officers experiencing the effects for just a second or so describe it as the most agonizing pain they’ve ever known – yet these devices are now available in America to members of the general public and are carried by almost every police officer in the country.

What is the matter with us?

Why are we so scared of our fellow humans that we need to invent such heinous devices, let alone market them as a fashion accessory? The Taser was originally billed as a device to save lives by constraining without the need for firearm use. In Britain, while Tasers are available to certain police officers specially trained in the use of firearms, they are not standard kit. Eight out of ten UK police officers would like to have them. Senior officers are concerned that, if they do, it may effect the relationship between the public and the police.

It will. They are right to be concerned.

The Taser may have a very minor role to play in official policing. Instead, there is much evidence it is used indiscriminately by officers as a handy way to bend victims to their will. The British police have proved over the years that firearms are not necessary for good general policing, provided that policy is backed by strict, nationwide, gun control. In America, the policy is to meet violence with greater violence. Statistics show, beyond doubt, that it does not work.

The Taser is a dangerous weapon, not a fashion accessory. It’s use should be curbed by stringent federal controls, as should the possession of any firearm.

Why Americans in particular should show such fear of one another is difficult to fathom, but unless they are prepared to take drastic steps to alleviate the root cause of that fear – the weapons they keep to defend themselves from each other – the innocent victims of such devilish creations as the gun and the Taser will continue to die.

Filed under:

Hosted By A2 Hosting

Website Developed By R J Adams