web analytics

Is The Surge On The Ebb?

Much is being made in Republican circles, particularly by administration officials and presidential nominees, of the success of George W Bush’s “Surge” tactic in Iraq.

We are told, “It is working.”

But how much of what we are told is truth, and how much just propaganda?

Today, yet again, the Baghdad Green Zone came under mortar and rocket attack. These are much more common than reported in the US press. This latest drew attention due to Cheney’s recent visit.

                    us-gren-zone_iraq.jpg

To quote “Iraq Today”:

“Plumes of thick black smoke rises from central Baghdad’s Green Zone after a rocket attack March 23, 2008. Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone, which houses the Iraqi parliament and U.S. embassy, was hit by a sustained barrage of rocket or mortar bomb fire early on Sunday, witnesses and officials said. (Mahmoud Raouf Mahmoud/Reuters)”

Sunni “Awakening Councils”, vital to the surge tactic, have helped stem the violence of al Qaeda forces unleashed on the country as a direct result of Bush and Blair’s invasion, and removal of Saddam Hussein.

Now, according to a recent Guardian newspaper film, the “Awakening Councils” are becoming disillusioned with their treatment by the US military, and threatening to withdraw their support:

        

It would seem George Bush’s tangle of Iraqi militias is beginning to unravel.

But then, to anyone with even a cursory knowledge of the region’s history and its culture, that news will come as no surprise whatever.

Filed under:

Truly Beyond Redemption?

It’s not often I feel so moved as to break off from a post, to write compulsively on another subject, but this has saddened me so much I feel compelled to express the views welling up from within.

I have the the greatest regard for Bill Moyers. I seldom miss a viewing of his “Journal” on PBS. His is the voice of reason and balance amongst a media paralyzed by the inhibitions of corporate indoctrination. Yet tonight, I watched only the first fifteen minutes of Bill Moyer’s Journal, before reaching for the “Off” switch in disgust.

Tonight’s program, an “Iraq War Anniversary Edition”, was devoted to a new film by Phil Donahue and Ellen Spiro called, “Body of War”.[1] It follows the post-war life of one Thomas Young, a twenty-four year old US enlistee who wanted to fight in Afghanistan, but ended up in Iraq. Five days after arriving there, he was shot in the chest and will spend the rest of his life in a wheelchair, paralyzed from the nipples down.

It’s a sad case. One of many sad cases. Perhaps it’s a case just sad enough to deserve the telling. But not now. Not at this moment.

This week marks the fifth anniversary of the beginning of the Iraq war. To be precise, it marks the day when one major superpower, and a few other hangers-on-nations hoping to curry favor, invaded another sovereign nation that had shown, or made, no act of aggression towards its invaders.

In the last five years, 4,000 US troops have died due to their country’s aggression; 176 British troops have died due to their country’s aggression. Somewhere around 600,000 to 1,000,000 innocent Iraqis have died due, not to their country’s aggression, but at the whim of America and its so-called “allies” in this illegal war.

It might be expected that, five years on, Bill Moyers Journal would tell the story of an Iraqi widow trying desperately to survive without her breadwinner; perhaps, the sad tale of one of the 5,000,000 (yes, five million) Iraqi orphans resulting from this unprovoked military aggression.

I know Bill Moyers is against this war. I respect his efforts, the often lone voice of the US media, attempting to inject a modicum of reason and commonsense where none prevails. It is because of this respect, this empathy with a voice crying in the media wilderness, that tonight I fear for the very future of mankind.

I have lived in America five and a half years. There is much here that both confuses and depresses me. Most noticeable in this country, compared to other nations, is its self-centered, insular, self-indulgence. That self-indulgence was never more emphasized than tonight on Bill Moyer’s Journal.

Discounting the harm, suffering, violence, and humiliation imposed on the Iraqi people by a megalomaniac of stupendous proportions, a people who may have wanted rid of their dictator, but never at the price demanded by his assassins, tonight the “Journal” chose to focus on the effects this manipulated war has had on one of its own soldiers; the suffering of a fellow American.

One could hope the people of America have learned something from the degradation they’ve been dragged through, yet again, by leaders intent on cementing their own personal powerbase throughout the outside world. It happened in Vietnam, with disastrous consequences for that nation and its people.

Uneducated by experience, and with not an iota of remorse, America launched itself, yet again, on a bloody and endless round of violence, torture, slaughter, and violent self-aggrandizement that has once more destroyed a whole nation, its people, its vast historic treasures, its dignity, all at the whim of another megalomaniac president and his band of criminal cohorts.

I could have hoped that Bill Moyers, on such a significant date, might have turned outward and examined the results of such megalomania; its effects on the true victims of this carnage. Instead, he chose to turn inward, like the rest of the US media, and examine only the results of this war on the perpetrators; the guilty; the violators of international law. To examine only how they have suffered.

If the great Bill Moyers chooses this course, who is there left to speak out for the real victims?

[1] “Body of War”, Bill Moyer’s Journal, March 2008

Filed under:

How Many Lightbulbs?

By 2016, the whole of America will have to give up the nice, warm, incandescent light bulbs we all know and love, for the cold, unfriendly, glare of those stupid, curly-wurly things that Wal-Mart sells for an arm and a leg, advertising that they last so much longer, and are much more environmentally friendly, than the good old hundred-watter of days gone by.

Personally, I’ve dug my heels in and refused to buy even one of these blighted monstrosities. Is it because they’re not as environmentally friendly as Wal-Mart decrees, or am I just one of those earth-unfriendly beings determined not to be put out by eco-warriors demanding I succumb to every crazy, “save the planet” idea they can un-glue from their marijuana-impregnated minds?

Well, certainly not the latter. I have the greatest regard for eco-warriors, marijuana-impregnated minds, or not. At least they’re making an effort to save the world from global warming, which is more than can be said for the politicians, who seem to think economies are just that bit more important than reversing climate change.

And that’s exactly why I have no stupid, curly-wurly, unfriendly-glare-inducing things sticking out of the light sockets in my house.

Still uncertain as to my thinking? Let me help you out.

In the town of Decatur, Illinois, exists a sugar-processing plant known colloquially as “Staley”. It is, in fact, owned by the titan corporate, “Tate & Lyle”, in turn owned by the ethanol producer, ADM, in turn owned by……and so on…..

“Great fleas have lesser fleas upon their backs to bite ’em, and little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum”

Below, is a photograph of Tate & Lyle’s Decatur plant or, at least, one of it’s polluting chimneys.

100_0348crop2.jpg

The effluent depicted flows from this chimney, without respite, for 365 days out of every year. Tate & Lyle have recently applied for, and been approved, two more boilers each allowed to emit one hundred tons each of carbon monoxide, and other lethal and greenhouse gases, every year. This has been passed by the EPA.

It’s just one plant of thousands throughout the US that pollutes and shortens the lives of many Americans in the great cause of making money for its owners.

What, you may ask, has this to do with the lightbulbs in my house?

It’s really a question of rather complex mathematics. I’ll leave you to ponder the answer.

How many lightbulbs will I have to change to counter the global warming pollutants of Tate & Lyle?

How many lightbulbs will America have to change to counteract corporate pollution throughout this nation?

When you’ve worked out the answer, and can convince me changing my lightbulbs will really help prevent further global warming, I’ll be happy to hear from you.

Oh, and by the way, those environmentally friendly, curly-wurly, lightbulbs contain toxic mercury. Drop one in your home and it could cost you $2,000 to have it safely cleaned up.[1]

Now that’s what I call “going green”.

[1] “Shining a light on hazards of fluorescent bulbs”, MSNBC

Filed under:

Hosted By A2 Hosting

Website Developed By R J Adams