web analytics

Canada, Anyone?

canada

We’ve been away for a few days to Canada. Not too far, just a couple of hundred miles across the border into Ontario. It was our first time in Canada. Initially, I was disappointed. I suppose, with it being a Commonwealth country, I expected it to be a rather larger version of England. Sadly, it had far more in common with the United States. With hindsight, and as my wife pointed out, it was naive to expect anything else. After all, the two are neighbors and Europe is half a world away.

There were some differences, though. At least they call motor fuel, ‘petrol’, and not, ‘gas’. After all, in the US gas can be something you put in your car, use to fire up the barbecue, or expel from one’s ass – or, one’s ass’s ass, for that matter. It can still be somewhat confusing, even after ten years in this country.

The Canadian news program is different also. More news, less brainwash. Now that’s definitely more British. The program covered a lot more world news than one gets from the US media, and they were quite extensive in their coverage of the Colorado wildfires and tornado damage in the US mid-West. I thought that was rather nice. When was the last time you heard the word, ‘Canada’, issue from the lips of Brian Williams, Scott Pelley, or Diane Sawyer – unless it was to do with an oil pipeline?

We arrived home this evening, just in time to learn from NBC that our dear leader-president Obama has decided to intervene in Syria. Presumably, he’s taken time out from his secret meetings with corporate bodies, selling out the American people under the guise of the Trans Pacific Trade Partnership, to take another step towards US domination of the Middle East on behalf of Israel, by once again committing the US to interference in the affairs of another country.

The excuse, this time, is the Syrian regime’s supposed use of chemical weapons. Interestingly, only last month the United Nations reported that chemical weapons had been used by the opposition rebels in Syria, not by the regime.[1]

Suddenly, the US government has strong evidence Assad has crossed the dear leader-president’s ‘red-line’, making it necessary for him to take sides. Like he hadn’t already done so months ago.

Perhaps the US people, even the world, ought to consider the outcome of more US intervention (and, so far as Middle Eastern nations are concerned, US intervention means Western intervention) in that region.

Surely, first and foremost, it is the responsibility of governments to keep their own people safe. The effect of Western intervention in Syria will bring every hothead Islamic terrorist out of the woodwork. Dear leader-president Obama, along with dear leader-prime minister Cameron, and others happy to lick the US bootstraps in return for favors undisclosed (check out ex-British prime minister Tony Blair’s rewards for ‘services rendered’, if in any doubt) is acting with gross irresponsibility towards those he’s supposed to serve by even the suggestion of support for the Syrian rebels, who are, incidentally, made up of many factions, including al Qaeda and other crazed Islamic extremists.

Most of the US news tonight centered around the catastrophic events occurring throughout areas of America due to severe climatic conditions. Hundreds, possibly thousands, of Americans are losing their homes, all they possess, due to fire, flood, tornadoes, or some other major atmospheric upheaval.

Where is dear leader-president Obama’s concern for his own people? Has he done anything to stop this meteorological ravaging of citizens in his own country? Everyone in their right mind knows the extreme weather patterns are due to man-made global climate change, yet all dear leader-president wants is to engage in another war in the Middle East.

Of course, it’s unthinkable that it may all be part of the great master plan. Despite all the silly bell ringing and emotive ceremony that accompanies the anniversary of 9/11 each year, the event is well forgotten. The American people, like all others everywhere, get on with their lives. Perhaps we should remember 9/11 a little more carefully. One thing we should all remember is a certain sentence from a document compiled by a supposedly now defunct organization – the PNAC.

…the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor”.[2]

That statement, and its accompanying dossier on the future of United States military interventionism, was written exactly one year prior to the attacks of 9/11/2001.

Is the PNAC defunct? Maybe. But those responsible for compiling that report – for writing that sentence – are still very much alive and functioning, albeit somewhat less prominently.

There can be no doubt they held considerable influence in the administration of George W Bush. The unanswered question is how much influence they still wield in the circles of the present administration?

My guess is, quite a lot. Dear leader-president Obama, he of the glib tongue and a thousand broken election promises, seems determined to steer the exact same course as laid down by the PNAC nearly thirteen years ago.

My other guess is that this country, in its determined quest for world domination, is eventually going to drag us all into a global conflict of catastrophic proportions.

Maybe we should all consider moving to Canada, because the one factor obvious from my four days in that country was that sanity reigns a little more prominently there than it does in the United States of America.

[1] “U.N. has testimony that Syrian rebels used sarin gas: investigator” Reuters, May 5th 2013

[2] “A Report of The Project for the New American Century September 2000”

Religion – 1, Atheism – 0 (But Only Thanks To Pope Francis)

Two items hit the headlines this week in America. The first was a message from the new Pope Francis:

Basically, the Pope is saying that it matters not whether one is Roman Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, Buddhist, atheist, or whatever. All that matters is we do good towards others – without distinction. That is the only way to ever achieve peace on this planet.

Only the moronic among us could find any argument against that philosophy. Full marks to Pope Francis.

The second item was the horrific tornado that flattened the town of Moore, Oklahoma. In these days of man-made climate change (albeit, its existence still argued by the flat-earth society and oil-friendly politicians) even a tornado as bad as this one, (and it was the worst ever according to meteorologists), is only just newsworthy compared with Boston bombers and the IRS targeting of innocent right-wing friendly societies. Wolf Blitzer, CNN’s resident plonker, managed to stir up sentiment by assuming everyone in the state of Oklahoma (an area of the US with the affliction of not only being part of Tornado Alley, but also the Bible Belt) was an out-and-out religious nutter.

In fairness to Blitzer, he probably found the only atheist within two hundred miles to ask: “Did you thank the Lord for saving you?”

It’s easy to drop a gaffe in the heat of the moment, and today’s internet is merciless in sending such faux pas viral in an instant. The reaction was not uniquely American.

One of the great criticisms of US Protestantism is its cliquishness. Belong to a small church somewhere and you’ll be looked after during hard times. Don’t belong, and you won’t. Many of these churches verge on the Masonic.

This is exactly what Pope Francis was preaching about in his homily this week, or rather, it was the opposite of his message. Francis said we needed to do good to everyone, whatever their belief system, and not confine our charity to those within our small group.

When Rebecca Vitsmun told Wolf Blitzer she was an atheist and it went viral on the internet, the next thing we heard was that ‘Atheists Unite’ had set up an appeal and $7,000 had already been raised to help rebuild her house!

According to their spokesperson:

It’s important that our community shows that we have your back when you come out publicly as an atheist. Let’s show the world that you don’t need to believe in a god to have human compassion nor does all charity fall under the banner of religion. Let’s get this courageous woman and her family back in their own home.”

NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!

What is the matter with these people? They’re more concerned with getting one over on the Christian community than helping this woman and her family. What about all the other families needing to rebuild their homes?

This is exactly what’s wrong with the world today. We’re all too busy trying to prove our case is the right one, and everyone else’s is wrong, that we’ll only help those who advance our cause. The result is mistrust and condemnation of others, and a fear of reprisals that inflames hatred and violence.

This writer refuses to be pigeon-holed. He’s not religious, neither so arrogant as to describe himself as an atheist. He prefers to live in this life because he’s highly dubious of the existence of any other, and considers ‘Heaven’ and ‘Hell’ as childhood fairy tales. He has, on many occasions, called the Roman Catholic church to task for its inhumane doctrines, and criticized previous popes for their pomposity and lack of basic humanity.

On this occasion, Pope Francis is right, and Atheists Unite is dead wrong. Appeal for funds, by all means, but for all the victims of Moore, Oklahoma, not just one because she happens to hold the same beliefs as you.

Atheists Unite’s appeal is not about doing good. It’s no more than an inglorious attempt to further a cause.

Will You Be Next?

Niemoeller

In Cyprus, they stole the savings of private citizens to cover their own bad debts.[1]

In Britain, they are stealing the pensions of the wives and widows of expat UK citizens, under the guise of ‘austerity measures’.[2]

In America, they are stealing from the pension funds of government retirees, to stave off their own self-induced default on the national debt.[3]

Do you think your savings are safe?

When will they be coming for yours?

[1] “Bank of Cyprus depositors could lose up to 60% of their savings” Guardian, march 30th 2013

[2] “Expat Wives and Widows to be Stripped of their UK Pension Rights” Fabulous 103Fm, May 2013

[3] “US Treasury secretary says he has begun tapping federal retiree pension fund to avoid default” Star Tribune, May 20th 2013*

*My thanks to WiseWebWoman for the ‘heads-up’ on this one.

Hosted By A2 Hosting

Website Developed By R J Adams