Author: R J Adams

It’s been a while. Frankly, with the onset of maturity it becomes more difficult to associate oneself with the madness of the human species. Its lust for power over its fellows can surely only end in its downfall.

With the advent of ISIS in the Middle East, the West is once more in a state of confusion. Our politicians scurry round like church mice searching for the last dropped morsel from the communion table. They spout all sorts of crazy notions for dealing with this latest threat to the West’s centuries-long complacency: that we can treat others with disdain and never face the consequences.

ISIS is no minor Arab skirmish between tribes vying for power. It poses a threat to the world comparable with Nazi Germany in the 1930s. The world shilly-shallied then. It’s behaving in a similar manner today. ISIS must be stopped while it’s still possible to do so. It’s forces grow stronger with each day that passes.

Yesterday, it was ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria). Today, it’s IS (Islamic State). Tomorrow, it will be ICME (Islamic Caliphate of the Middle East).

Make no mistake, its leaders intend world domination. They’ll not be content with reclaiming the lands of the Ottoman. Their quest is total Islam, just as the Nazi intention was world Aryanism.

Meanwhile, Obama talks. He talks with European leaders; he talks with his opposition leaders. He wants to “…train and arm the moderate Syrian rebels…”. Who are they? Where are they? The truth is they’ve collapsed under the weight of militant Islamic forces in Syria, and are no longer a viable opposition.

The West “trained and armed” the Iraqi army; they “trained and armed” the Afghan army; they “trained and armed the Libyan rebels against Gaddafi”. We’ve seen the results of such “training and arming”.

In Iraq, the army was routed and ISIS helped themselves to the US arms; in Afghanistan, the army regularly assassinates US soldiers and much of the arms end up with the Taliban; in Libya, the country is overrun with armed thugs vying for power and the government has collapsed.

The West is not good at “training and arming” it’s so-called ‘allies’. Yet, Obama wants to utilize the same, failed, tactics that have resulted in nothing but misery and suffering for millions of innocents in the nations the US has “trained and armed”.

There’s a simple solution to the ISIS problem, but it’s not a politically acceptable one in the West. NATO needs to join forces with the Assad regime in Syria and destroy the ISIS strongholds, put an end to the Syrian civil war, then use its diplomatic muscle to work peaceably with Assad towards an, eventually, democratic Syria.

Assad is not the ogre painted by the West. He was working to effect change in his country before the civil war, but Islamic extremists scuppered his plans and whipped up the Sunni base to rebellion, hoping to gain power themselves.

Why is the West determined to dethrone Assad? Because Saudi Arabia wants rid of him. Obama talks of procuring Saudi military assistance (‘boots on the ground’), but with much of the ISIS funding coming from that region, albeit nefariously, it’s unlikely King Abdullah will be too keen to publicize any firm allegiance. Besides, the Saudi royals are desperate to rid themselves of the Assad regime in Syria, a Mediterranean ally of the hated Shia Iran.

It’s vitally important to note that the US/UK invasion of Iraq in 2002 is DIRECTLY responsible for the situation in that country today, the rise of ISIS, and the subsequent deaths and atrocities committed by that organization. Had Saddam Hussein remained in power he would never had allowed his nation to sink so far into the political mire it could be overwhelmed so easily. He would have routed ISIS, just as he did with al-Qaeda – despite the lies perpetrated by Western propaganda.

Americans, or those 84% who voted to invade Iraq in 2002, have the blood of hundreds of thousands on their hands, yet public opinion here is turning in favor of military action based solely on the executions of two men, just because they happened to hold US passports.

It’s time for the West to take concerted action, and let the Gulf states complain about it if they choose. But, it won’t happen. Western politicians will procrastinate, just as they did in the 1930s, and ISIS will grow and grow.

When asked about his support for US military action, one senator, from a certain Southern state, told an NBC reporter yesterday:

I just can’t see the end game in this, and I can’t support military action without a viable endgame.”

He obviously hasn’t given a moment’s thought to what “the endgame” might be, if we do nothing.

^{[1] “Islamic State: Where does jihadist group get its support?” BBC, September 1st 2014}

…we tortured some folks. But I understand how it happened.”

People like Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris really bother me. In case you’re not familiar with the names, Dawkins is an espouser of atheism, and has authored a number of books including, “The God Delusion,” and, “The Selfish Gene.”

He’s an ethologist, an evolutionary biologist, and a professor (probably of both subjects, for all I know). He’s English, and aging.

Harris, on the other hand is relatively young (born 1967). He’s American and studied at Stanford. Dawkins, of course, went to Oxford.

Harris also espouses atheism, has written books on the subject (“The End Of Faith”; “The Moral Landscape”) and spends much of his time giving lectures, contributing to various media outlets, and making documentaries.

As someone who would probably be best described as an ‘agnostic with a distinct tendency towards atheism’ (though I HATE pigeon-holes!) why do I find these two men so concerning?

It’s because they’ve elevated themselves to the High Priesthood of Atheism (you’ll note the capital ‘A’). One of the major defects of virtually all religions is the demand they place on their followers to persuade others to their way of thinking. Over the course of centuries it’s frequently led to violence and terrorism. In the case of modern Islam, this has become frighteningly apparent in the early part of the 21st century.

Dawkins and Harris are hell-bent on persuading their followers to disdain other religious groups and proselytize the cause of Atheism. They use their writings, the internet, radio and television, and any other form of media available to them, to achieve this.

By so doing they are empowering themselves as leaders of what could be described as a new ‘religion’. A cult of Atheism. This makes them no better than the High Priests and Mullahs of the very religions they denigrate.

I agree with much, though not all, they believe. Frankly, given the lowly status of our species, compared to the vastness of the Universe and what may lie beyond, I find it the height of arrogance to categorically deny the possible existence of any ‘Super-Intelligence’ (though not in any form worshiped by orthodox religions), just as I find it equally egotistical for a priest of religion to believe himself bestowed with a God-given right to intercede between some divinity and the rest of us.

It might be tolerable if Harris and Dawkins stopped at preaching atheism, but like most who achieve some degree of fame and power in the world, inevitably they come to believe their philosophies are water-tight and we should duly accept anything they utter as absolute truth.

In a recent article (now available on his blog) Harris delivers a rather long, wandering, disquisition, entitled, “Why Don’t I Criticize Israel?”^[1] The only conclusion to be drawn from it is that Harris supports the Israeli position because, in his eyes, they’re more civilized. Perhaps if he lived in the rat-hole that is Gaza, with no way out except through Israeli-controlled checkpoints, where basic necessities of life are scarce because everything gets checked by Israelis before being allowed in (and much of it is rejected), where 60% of the populace are unemployed because no company would commit economic suicide by building a factory there, where electricity is only available for a few hours a day, he might better understand why Israel, prosperous and with modern cities, a vibrant economy, supported to the tune of billions of American dollars annually, appears on the surface to be “more civilized”.

Dawkins, these days is generally less vociferous than Harris, but managed to get a page of the BBC News website all to himself this week after tweeting:

“Date rape is bad. Stranger rape at knifepoint is worse.” He added: “If you think that’s an endorsement of date rape, go away and learn how to think.”^[2]

Not only is Dawkins wrong in his proclamation (Rape is a statutory legal offense) but his arrogance, emblazoned within the final sentence, takes one’s breath away.

It’s a common fault of the human species to assume we are right and others are wrong. It’s this failing that results in much of the violence inflicted in the world today. The tags we use to justify it, whether religious, economic, or otherwise, are merely tags.

In this sense, Harris, Dawkins, and their ilk are just as guilty as those they condemn. The truth is they are equally as capable of being wrong as the rest of us.

There is one atheist for whom I hold the greatest respect. He didn’t preach; he didn’t condemn, or mock others. Sadly, he’s no longer with us, but his vision, poetry, and love for this world, the Universe, and all things in it, I found way more inspiring than the dry, tired, soporific, versions of eternal heavenly bliss trotted out by the be-robed snake oil salesmen who vend their wares under the guise of priest, mullah, or pastor.

Next time you sit in a room with sunlight streaming through the window and notice the minute specks of matter floating in the sunbeam, be reminded of the words of Carl Sagan as he described the view of Planet Earth as seen from Voyager I while six billion miles away. Our planet would have been invisible from that distance, except for a chance sunbeam that happened to illuminate it as a tiny speck of dust.

Sagan’s words are in the right-hand sidebar of Sparrow Chat, together with Voyager I’s image. When Carl Sagan was dying he knew his death would be the end for him. He believed in no heaven; no afterlife. He didn’t need to. The wonders of the Earth and the Universe, that had unfolded before him during his relatively short lifetime, were sufficient.

Look again at that dot. That’s here. That’s home. That’s us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every “superstar,” every “supreme leader,” every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there-on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.” ~ Carl Sagan 1994.

Are Dawkins and Harris in the same league as Sagan? I’ll leave you to be your own judge of that.

But, for me, they are as insignificant as that one speck of dust revealed by a sunbeam.

^{[1] “Why Don’t I Criticize Israel?” http://www.samharris.org July 27th 2014}

^{[2] “#BBCTrending: Dawkins angers his followers on Twitter” BBC, July 29th 2014}