web analytics

Hardly A Comedy Of Errors

What’s the difference between Gatwick Airport in London, England, and the US financial markets?

The answer is – quite a lot.

Britain’s Competition Commission (formerly the Monopolies and Mergers Commission until 1998) has forced Gatwick Airport to put itself up for sale.[1] The owners, BAA, have got too big and powerful (they own seven major airports in Britain) and, the Commission say, competition is suffering as a result.

In contrast, the US financial industry has been in charge of its own regulation for a number of years; result: there hasn’t been any. Unless someone can now pull off a miracle, and no-one can, the global economy will slide into recession for the foreseeable future.

George W Bush yesterday acknowledged the crisis as ‘these adjustments to the financial markets’. Considering it was only last week he said the US economy was hunky-dory and incredibly buoyant, this must surely mean we’re only one step away from another Great Depression.

Ironically, within a week, the Republican government of George W Bush has turned violently Socialist, nationalizing not only the mortgage giants Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac, but the monster, AIG, as well. Without so much as a ‘by-your-leave’, they’ve taken billions of dollars of our money and poured it down the throats of, perhaps, the three greediest companies on the planet.

Cable news channels have made much of us “waking up this morning to find we own an insurance company……”.

What utter rubbish. We don’t ‘own’ anything. In fact, we may find we ‘own’ a lot less by the time this fiasco has played itself out. Can those people who’ve lost their savings from collapsed banks go knocking on AIG’s door, asking for their share of the company – in dollar bills, please. Of course not.

Washington may now own part of AIG, the government certainly does, but that only means it controls the decision-making within the company. Given the half-baked financial ideas to come out of Washington lately, it’s unlikely Poulson and Benanke can do any better than AIG’s grasping board of directors.

Remember the government hand-out checks earlier this year that were supposed to boost the economy and put everything back on track?[2] They didn’t work, did they? And it looks like we’re about to give them back – with interest.

The sub-prime mortgage crisis came about because banks loaned money irresponsibly to those with no financial ability to repay the debt. Both banks and borrowers are now facing the consequences. Loaning large sums of government money to companies, now in similar straits to the house-buyers they conned, seems equally irresponsible. More so, when the government is simply printing the dollar bills to pay for it.

An MSNBC ‘financial expert’ was asked yesterday if it was possible to go on printing money in this way. He responded with this:

“The Feds wallet is infinite. They can print money till the cows come home. Now, the downside is, of course, sparking inflation down the road, but the ability to raise money and provide rescue funds is basically without end.”[3]

This is possibly the most outrageously irresponsible statement I’ve ever heard on an American news program. Making money by printing money is a short term recipe for financial disaster. This “expert’s” almost casual reference to inflation proved that, somewhere deep in the recesses of his tiny mind, he had heard of a country called Zimbabwe.

Of course, there’s no-one to blame. It’s nobody’s fault. Cable news anchors wring their hands and look glum, but not one of them points a finger, or dares to demand there should be retribution. So, just who is responsible?

Interviewed on BBC America News tonight, Bob Diamond, the president of Barclays, wasn’t too concerned. He doesn’t need to be; his company has just bought the remnants of Lehmann Bros at a giveaway price. Moving one step beyond George W Bush’s “adjustments” he admitted there were “some issues” in the financial system. He went on:

“but we’ve learned a lot about liquidity, and I think those lessons needed to be learned.”

An admission that the President of Barclays is using a financial meltdown to swot up on ‘liquidity’ hardly inspires confidence. Shouldn’t he, and his fellow CEO’s, have learned about liquidity at college? Or, at least taken a night-school course before running one of the biggest financial institutions on the planet?

Mister Diamond, you may use our taxpayer’s money to pay for your education, but we also need to learn our lessons. Like you, the people of America have pretended to know much, and learned little. We trusted you and your corporate ilk. That was our mistake. We relied on our government to oversee your industry. It failed in its duty. For that the US president bears ultimate responsibility.

America always tries to do things ‘its’ way. It never looks beyond its borders for ideas, because being America, it doesn’t believe anyone else could have any better ideas. America needs to remove its blinders. That’s one of the lessons we have to learn in order not to let Bob Diamond, and his financial buddies, get away with the greed and corruption that is the true cause of the financial chaos taking place in the world today.

The British Competition Commission, in line with European Community legislation, has forced a huge company, BAA, to split itself up. If the American people, through its government, had ensured similar regulatory legislation was in place, together with effective control of the US financial sector, AIG would never have become so huge that its demise could rock the world; the sub-prime mortgage fiasco would never have occurred; Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac need not have been nationalized, and the global marketplace would not be turned upside-down, as it is today.

The American people need to learn lessons from others, more experienced. Rampant, unchecked capitalism inevitably produces a free-for-all of greed and corruption. In the end, it’s the ordinary people of America, and throughout the world, who will pay for it.

[1] “Gatwick Airport put up for sale” BBC, September 17th 2008

[2] “A Drop In The Ocean?” Sparrow Chat, January 24th 2008

[3] No link, but if you’re quick you may catch this video interview on the NBC Nightly News, website, labeled, “Desperate Times, Desperate Measures”.

Filed under:

The People? Or, The Government? You Decide….

The wreckage of Galveston,Texas, lies strewn over many square miles after Hurricane Ike sauntered through the low-lying township, whipping up seas and tearing apart houses. Thankfully, mandatory evacuation orders meant everyone got out alive before the storm broke.

Except, that we hear today of twenty-three thousand residents who didn’t go anywhere. They stayed behind, put their lives, and those of others, at great risk. Then they had the nerve to demand rescue, food and shelter, after their homes were badly damaged and water and power disconnected.

In English, the definition of “mandatory” is ‘obligatory’, ‘constituting a command’. In Texan, apparently, it means something completely different.

Those from Galveston, who disobeyed the mandatory evacuation order, obviously spared little thought for the danger they imposed on the people required to rescue them when their overactive egos and Texan bravado ran out, and they dialed 911, pleading for assistance.

Over three thousand 911 calls during the night, according to one report.

Perhaps, in future, ‘mandatory’ might mean a hefty fine for those who choose to disobey. Freedom to lose one’s own life is fine; freedom to possibly cause the deaths of others, is not.

Meanwhile, further west in Los Angeles, they’re clearing up after the most deadly train crash in California’s history. We learn today the driver of the passenger train ignored a red signal. He was an employee of twelve year’s experience.

Human error is not tolerated well in modern society, particularly when it leads to such carnage. Nevertheless, whether on the road, in the air, or on the tracks, no matter how good the training, how reliable the machines, human error will always come back to haunt us from time to time. Human beings are not machines, even though their employers often demand they must be.

To overcome human error and help save lives, for four decades rail designers have been building a fail-safe system into their machinery. It’s called ‘Positive Train Control’. Most rail systems throughout Europe are fitted with PTC. It will stop a train if it runs a red signal.

The American National Transport Safety Board has been pushing for this system in California for a long time. Unfortunately, the legislation to allow that to happen is, according to the BBC, “hung up in Congress.”

After the Placentia, California, rail crash in April 2002 the NTSB issued a statement that included this damning remark from Chairman Ellen Engleman:

“The Safety Board has issued recommendations on Positive Train Control since 1969. The technology these systems provide are the best approach to reducing human error collision,” Engleman said. “The Board’s strong interest in this issue was further demonstrated when we placed PTC on our Most Wanted list in 1990.” [my bold]{1]

It begs the question: why has Congress made no effort to pass this legislation since 1969?

It’s not necessarily true, to quote Alexis de Tocqueville, that “people get the government they deserve,” but when one brings together the irresponsible inhabitants of Galveston and the even less accountable politicians who have sat on their well-padded backsides in Congress over the last forty years, and done nothing but pass pork bills, then mayhap de Tocqueville’s quote contains an element of truth after all.

[1] NTSB, October 10th 2003

Filed under:

Hosted By A2 Hosting

Website Developed By R J Adams