web analytics

A Whole New Meaning To ‘Food Additives’

“Care for a nice portion o’ dry-roasted rat, guv’nor, wiv a drop of freshly crushed roach sauce? Luvly wiv a few peanuts on the side.”

I do the cooking in our house. It’s not that my wife can’t cook, but she can only cook American. Fortunately, she likes European, which is what I cook, because I won’t eat American.

I don’t like most American food, and while I’m sure there are many good gourmet restaurants in this nation (though not so many in the corn belt, outside of Chicago) their menus do little to boost my appetite.

I also do the food shopping – attentively. After eight years of George W Bush and his slack-Alice administration, American foodstuffs can no longer be trusted, so I choose it with care. Wholesome ingredients are available, even when shopping somewhere like Wal-Mart, but only if you know what to look for, and what to avoid – not just like the plague, but from fear of catching it.

We’ve all heard of the salmonella outbreak that’s recently killed a number of Americans, and laid low many more. The “Peanut Corporation of America” was the culprit. This is a company so big, Kelloggs was one of its regular customers.

Yesterday, the New York Daily News ran a report on the state of this company:

One rat, dry roasted, was found at the Georgia peanut plant blamed for a sweeping salmonella outbreak that has killed eight people across the country and sickened hundreds more.

Jonathan Prather, who was laid off last month when the Peanut Corp. of America plant was shuttered, told CBS News on Tuesday that roaches also ran rampant.

“Roaches get up there in the dry roast,” Prather told the Early Show. “Some of them blend in with the peanuts. You’d never know they’re there.”

Prather, 29, called the plant a pig-sty and that there were “plenty of holes in the roof.”

“When it rained, water just came through the whole plant,” he said.

The worst, though, was the rat Prather said he saw “dry roasting in the peanuts” three or four months ago.

Fancy a Kellogg’s cookie, anyone?

The feds say the Georgia plant had a salmonella problem dating back at least to June 2007 – but never told the FDA.

Meanwhile, the Associated Press reported that another Peanut Corp. plant in Plainview, Tex., has been operating for four years without a license – and has never been inspected.

“I was not aware this plant was in operation and did not know (what) type of products (were) processed,” chief Texas health inspector Patrick Moore wrote in a report snagged by AP.

Luckily, no salmonella was found at the Texas plant.[1]

“Luckily” is the wrong word. Luck has nothing whatever to do with the production of safe, wholesome, foodstuffs. It’s all about responsible management, coupled with regular, strict inspections and monitoring by government officials, who act on behalf of the consumer and do their jobs efficiently, without recourse to bribes and management backhanders as an incentive to “look the other way”.

It’s not just the Peanut Corporation of America who are responsible for the suffering and deaths caused by this outbreak, but the Kellogg’s Corporation, and other companies, who have a responsibility to ensure their suppliers meet the high standards of hygiene we, the consumer, should be demanding of them.

Until America puts its house in order, those who live in our house will continue to eat carefully selected, and wholesomely cooked, safe European cuisine.

[1] “Peanut Corporation whistleblower: Rats, cockroaches roasted with Peanut Butter” Daily News, February 3rd 2009

Filed under:

Oh, Golly!

Hear we go again. The BBC has fired presenter Carol Thatcher for referring to a tennis player as a ‘golliwog’.

Apparently, the remark was made ‘off-air’, but other presenters took exception and reported her for the comment.

I guess the first lesson is: make sure you know who your friends are.

So far as I’m concerned the Thatcher family are all a bunch of ignorant snobs (Carol is the daughter of Margaret, once prime minister of the UK) but I’m not sure this isn’t carrying political correctness to extremes.

Is it more likely, perhaps, the other presenters found Ms Thatcher intolerable, and seized the opportunity to drop her in it?

The Associated Press explains, in its article on the subject, that:

The word “golliwog,” referring to a black doll-like character, was once widely used including as the emblem of a leading make of British jam, but in recent decades has been dropped after claims it was racist.”[1]

I fondly remember, as a small child, the cuddly toy golliwog I carried with me everywhere. I loved it. I also avidly collected all the Robertson’s jam golliwogs, and was the first in our street to have a full set.

robertson_gollies

I guess that stamps me as a racist. Now, I’ll never work for the BBC.

As a postscript, one of Britain’s most distinguished peers and politicians, Lord Tebbit, commented:

It does seem very odd that Jonathan Ross[2] can be back broadcasting having made obscene, insulting remarks on the air, and Carol Thatcher, who said something which is allegedly highly offensive but which I rather doubt was meant to be so, in private, should be banned in this way.

“It is probably a bit of a way for the BBC to get back at Carol’s mother.”[3]

Which adds absolutely nothing to the narrative, but does serve to demonstrate the standard of British nobility sitting in the Upper House of the British Parliament.

[1] “BBC drops Carol Thatcher over ‘golliwog’ remark” AFP, February 3rd 2009

[2] “Russell Brand resigns from BBC as Jonathan Ross apologises for ‘juvenile remarks'” Guardian, October 29th 2008

[3] “Golliwog remark gets Carol in a jam” ITV, February 4th 2009

Filed under:

Hosted By A2 Hosting

Website Developed By R J Adams