web analytics

Have You Had Your ‘National Referendum’ Yet?

I received a letter yesterday from Republican Congressman John Boehner, the House Republican Leader. Well, in truth, it was sent to my wife. She’s an American citizen. I’m not, so I don’t count.

As my wife is certainly ‘left of center’, she made to throw it in the garbage, but I stopped her. After all, if the illustrious Mister Boehner takes the trouble to write, it’s only good manners to respond.

The envelope was marked: “NATIONAL REFERENDUM ENCLOSED”, and the contents began:

“Dear Fellow American……I’ll keep this short and sweet……”

It then continues for two pages……(!)

CLICK ON IMAGES AND ENLARGE

Apart from blacking the registration and voting district code, all other graffiti on the letter is Mister Boehner’s own work.

Basically, Mister Boehner wants to, “……..end the reign of Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House – before she and President Obama do irreversible damage.”

To help achieve this end he enclosed a questionnaire. Apparently, my wife is the hand-picked representative of our town (which is amazing considering her politics) and her answers are crucial to ejecting Nancy Pelosi from her position.

Quite how Mister Boehner & Co intend to achieve this dethronement isn’t made clear, but the letter is an obvious attempt to a) obtain money (“Enclosed is my most generous financial gift……etc.) and, b) obtain a quantity of heavily loaded data to ‘prove’ the majority of Americans are solidly behind Boehner & Co’s devious tactics.

While most party literature is only sent to known members, this communication has been deliberately sent to both sides. Obviously, the vast majority of non-Republicans who receive one will do with it exactly as my wife did – chuck it in the garbage.

This is exactly what they expect to happen. That way, only questionnaires completed by Republicans will be returned, and Boehner & Co can truthfully state that, of all those received back at party headquarters, nearly 100% were solidly in favor of ousting Pelosi.

So, if you’ve been hand-picked to represent your town in this great ‘National Referendum’ on Nancy Pelosi, don’t toss it, complete it by marking an ‘X’ in all the “NO” boxes, and return it in the envelope provided.

And, don’t put a stamp on it. It’s a ‘Business Reply Mail’ envelope and it’ll cost the NRCC to get it back.

I’m just off out to the mailbox.

Filed under:

My Only Comment Ever On The UK General Election (At Least Until May 7th)

The forthcoming British general election is such a non-event that it hardly merits discussion. Gordon Brown’s revelation that May 6th would, indeed, be election day surprised no-one, as the date had been leaked to the public domain over a month ago.

The UK media is doing its best to pump up public enthusiasm, but Brits are so fed up with politicians and their sleazy, underhand, games that turn-out looks like being at a record low.

David Cameron, the still-wet-behind-the-ears Tory party leader is telling the people the Tories are the party of change. It’s hardly original, is it? That’s been the slogan of every political party in opposition since Robert Walpole.

(For American readers ignorant of UK political history, Walpole is considered to have been the first British prime minister. His title was, Sir Robert Walpole KG, KB, PC – though he was more colloquially known as “that fat old Squire of Norfolk”).

How can the Tories be the ‘party of change’ when their policies are nearly identical to those of the present government?

There was a time the British electoral system was unique. Not any more. Now, the ‘American way’ has permeated all aspects of UK politics, so it comes as no shock to learn that both major parties have employed the services of certain American gentlemen responsible for the success of the Obama presidential campaign in 2008.

Only two winners there, then. Given the low level of the UK pound it’s likely they’ll have requested their substantial fees upfront, and in dollars.

While both Gordon Brown and David Cameron are claiming a hung parliament (no working majority for any party) will prove a disaster for the country, what they truly mean is it’ll be a catastrophe for them. Serving the whims of their corporate masters would prove much more difficult with minor green parties, or even the much abused Liberal Democrats, in tow.

In fact, it might well prove the best situation for today’s Britain. Plenty of other governments are managing very well as coalitions, and the result is a much broader based political system. One has only to study the German model to perceive the advantages.

The British, however, have traditionally shown themselves to be a ‘two party’ people. When the one they choose lets them down – whether through fault, or simply circumstances beyond their control – they’ll swing en masse in the other direction.

They’ve always been a ‘suck it and see’ race, and not overly quick to learn from history.

So, my guess is that, while there’ll likely not be a Tory landslide come May 7th, David Cameron will be the next British prime minister, and the first Tory to achieve that since 1990.

If he fails to win, then the Tory party may as well pack in politics and take up flower arranging. Given the record of the Labour government, certainly during its last two terms in office, I doubt even the British can be that forgiving.

Sadly, though, the plain truth is they’ll be even worse off under the Tories.

Filed under:

A Sickening Tale Of Government Deception

Today, the British government announced its intention to turn 210,000 square miles of the Indian Ocean archipelago into the world’s largest marine reserve.

According to the BBC, the British Foreign Secretary David Milliband, said of the project:

Its creation is a major step forward for protecting the oceans, not just around BIOT [British Indian Ocean Territory] itself, but also throughout the world.

“This measure is a further demonstration of how the UK takes its international environmental responsibilities seriously.”[1]

The British government, it seems, is to be applauded.

Or, is it?

In a recent post on Sparrow Chat, I wrote of the US military base on Diego Garcia, the largest island in the Indian Ocean chain, and how it’s presently being stocked to the gills with armaments, including “Blu” bombs used for blasting hardened or underground structures.[2]

The area fell to Britain in 1814 with the defeat of Napoleon (originally, the islands had been conquered by the French), which probably would have made little difference to its 2,000 inhabitants, except that in the 1960’s the United States decided it needed a military base in the area. Diego Garcia was perfect for the job, or would have been were it not for the locals.

The last thing America wanted was a load of curious islanders delving into their affairs, so the British (who were being well paid for their skulduggery) forcibly ejected the lot. Some were shipped to Britain, the remainder dumped on a Mauritian quayside and left to fend for themselves.

The British government responsible for this disgusting act of barbarity was headed by the Labour prime minister, Harold Wilson. Edward Heath, his Tory successor, happily continued the policy.

For forty years the Chagossians have fought a bitter battle in the UK courts, for the right to return to their homeland. Finally, in 2007, seven judges agreed that their right of abode was so fundamental the British government could not take it away.

In response, the UK government appealed to its own legislative body, the Law Lords, who happily overruled the decision.

Well, they would, wouldn’t they?

Undeterred, the Chagossians have taken their case to the European Court of Human Rights. A verdict is expected this autumn.

Meanwhile, the British government announces its decision to turn the area into a marine reserve.

Which means a ban on fishing.

Which means the Chagossians, if they win their battle, will be unable to pursue the only livelihood open to them on the island.

With no means of support, they’ll be unable to return.

Such is the devious nature of the British government.

[1] “UK sets up Chagos Islands marine reserve” BBC, April 1st 2010

[2] “Matters We’re Not Supposed To Know About” Sparrow Chat, March 15th 2010

NOTE: John Pilger produced a documentary on the plight of the Chargossians. It’s called, “Stealing A Nation”, and is available on Google video or YouTube.

Filed under:

Hosted By A2 Hosting

Website Developed By R J Adams