web analytics

If Only

If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or, being lied about, don’t deal in lies,
Or, being hated, don’t give way to hating,
And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise……

Kipling had his own ideas of what made a man and most of us would, I guess, broadly agree with him. Yet that first verse of his famous ode is only the beginning. There is, as Kipling later points out, much more to being a man that just that.

Take Paul Wolfowitz, head of the World Bank, as an example. One could assume, after reading the lines above, that his dogmatic refusal to resign is an expression of manly aspirations. After all, he seems to be “keeping his head when all about are losing theirs” (one of his senior aides, Kevin Kellems, has just resigned, according to a BBC report today) and his self-trust is all too obvious, even though most others consider him dishonest. Quite obviously, he believes patience will win the day, though sadly it was lying that brought him to his impasse. He is certainly hated, particularly – we are told – by his co-workers at the Bank. We can only ponder on whether that negative emotion is mirrored in return.

At this point, then, he appears to achieve at least some measure of Kipling’s “manliness”. But, is it manly to cock a snoot (old English expression) at everyone around you, knowing they dislike you intensely; to continue in the same old way, seemingly oblivious of the negative vibrations you are generating throughout your workplace? If so, Paul Wolfowitz is one manly cookie.

However, there is a difference between manliness and arrogance, and in this case Wolfowitz is, I believe, merely expressing the latter.

In fact, the one common denominator that bound such neo-cons as Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld and Cheney was a surfeit of arrogance. Like all egocentric ogres they claw their way to power, and having attained it, cling fervently by well-manicured fingernails to the cliff edge of their positions. But even giants can be toppled. It just takes a bit of extra effort. Don a pair of good, hob-nailed boots, stamp on the fingers hard enough, and they will eventually plunge, shrieking and wailing to the end, into an abyss of anonymity – as Donald Rumsfeld eventually discovered.

“Who?” I hear you ask. “Oh, yes, Rumsfeld! We’d almost forgotten him.”

It seems likely Wolfowitz will soon follow a similar downward plummet, despite old pals in the White House desperately clinging to his fingertips. He, and his pals, wanted to “take over the Earth and everything that’s in it” but not, alas, in the way Kipling meant. They’re not true men; their only compassion is for themselves; they know bravado, but lack true bravery. Wolfowitz, and his cronies, will go the way of others deficient in the real manliness Kipling immortalized so vividly:

“If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with kings – nor lose the common touch;
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you;
If all men count with you, but none too much;
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run –
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And – which is more – you’ll be a Man my son!”

No. They will never be Men.

Filed under:

Taken To The Cleaners

It’s a sad little story of arrogance, intransigence, greed and, possibly, racism. In 1992, Jin Nam Chung, Ki Chung and their son, Soo Chung, moved from their native South Korea to the U.S., intending to start a new life and experience the power of the “American Dream”.

At first, all went well. The family opened their own dry cleaning business, which thrived. Then, along came Roy L. Pearson Jr with a number of suits to be altered. When Mister Pearson returned next day to collect his clothes, a pair of trousers was missing.

Mister Pearson isn’t a nobody. Mister Pearson is an African-American working as an administrative law judge in Washington, D.C. He used his knowledge of Washington’s strict consumer protection laws to attempt what can only be described as “legal extortion”. Pearson’s trousers were recovered within a week, but he refused to accept them, saying they weren’t his – despite being the right size and with his cleaning ticket attached – and demanded recompense to the tune of $15,000. The Chungs offered first $3,000, then $4,600, and finally $12,000, but Pearson refused them all.

Now, having put the Chung’s through hell for five years, he is suing them for $67,000,000.

Why that figure, can be revealed by reading the full story HERE if you missed it on the BBC World News this morning. Judge Roy L Pearson Jnr has certainly achieved world-wide infamy.

The real question to be asked is, why? Why has this man hounded a family for five years over something as innocuous as a pair of trousers?

Obviously, this has nothing to do with mislaid clothing. This is one man exercising his own supposed superiority, arrogance, greed and racism over those in a weaker position than himself.

This story is interesting because hidden within it is an analogy perhaps not immediately obvious. It may become clearer, however, if I suggest that the Chungs, despite their ruined lives, bitter frustrations, and disillusion with the “American Dream”, probably won’t resort to attacking the Manhattan skyline.

Filed under:

Hosted By A2 Hosting

Website Developed By R J Adams